more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Aristotle and the scholastics accept the analytic/synthetic distinction, but do not take it to be particularly significant.
Gist of Idea
Aristotelians accept the analytic-synthetic distinction
Source
Stephen Boulter (Why Medieval Philosophy Matters [2019], 5)
Book Ref
Boulter,Stephen: 'Why Medieval Philosophy Matters' [Bloomsbury 2019], p.122
A Reaction
I record this because I'm an Aristotelian, and need to know what I'm supposed to think. Luckily, I accept the distinction.
| 22134 | Thoughts are general, but the world isn't, so how can we think accurately? [Boulter] |
| 22135 | Our concepts can never fully capture reality, but simplification does not falsify [Boulter] |
| 22138 | Science rests on scholastic metaphysics, not on Hume, Kant or Carnap [Boulter] |
| 22139 | Experiments don't just observe; they look to see what interventions change the natural order [Boulter] |
| 22136 | Science begins with sufficient reason, de-animation, and the importance of nature [Boulter] |
| 22150 | Logical possibility needs the concepts of the proposition to be adequate [Boulter] |
| 22152 | Aristotelians accept the analytic-synthetic distinction [Boulter] |
| 22156 | The facts about human health are the measure of the values in our lives [Boulter] |