more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
If two things are incommensurable they cannot be incompatible.
Gist of Idea
Two things can't be incompatible if they are incommensurable
Source
Samir Okasha (Philosophy of Science: Very Short Intro (2nd ed) [2016], 5)
Book Ref
Okasha,Samir: 'Philosophy of Science: very short intro (2nd ed)' [OUP 2016], p.80
A Reaction
Kuhn had claimed that two rival theories are incompatible, which forces the paradigm shift. He can't stop the slide off into total relativism. The point is there cannot be a conflict if there cannot even be a comparison.
| 12127 | Many different theories will fit the observed facts [Bacon] |
| 5940 | Two goods may be comparable, although they are not commensurable [Ross] |
| 17650 | We lack frames of reference to transform physics, biology and psychology into one another [Goodman] |
| 12128 | In theory change, words shift their natural reference, so the theories are incommensurable [Kuhn] |
| 6162 | Kuhn has a description theory of reference, so the reference of 'electron' changes with the descriptions [Rowlands on Kuhn] |
| 22184 | Incommensurability assumes concepts get their meaning from within the theory [Kuhn, by Okasha] |
| 7619 | Galileo's notions can't be 'incommensurable' if we can fully describe them [Putnam on Kuhn] |
| 3866 | If theories are really incommensurable, we could believe them all [Newton-Smith] |
| 4732 | One may understand a realm of ideas, but be unable to judge their rationality or truth [O'Grady] |
| 22185 | Two things can't be incompatible if they are incommensurable [Okasha] |