more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22201

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 13. Against Definition ]

Full Idea

Definition cannot take the same form in philosophy as it does in mathematics; the imitation of mathematical procedure is invariably in this respect not only unfruitful, but perverse and most harmful in its consequences.

Gist of Idea

The use of mathematical-style definitions in philosophy is fruitless and harmful

Source

Edmund Husserl (Ideas: intro to pure phenomenology [1913], Intro)

Book Ref

Husserl,Edmund: 'Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology', ed/tr. Boyce Gibson,W [Routledge 2012], p.6


A Reaction

A hundred years of analytic philosophy has entirely ignored this warning. My heart has always sunk when I read '=def...' in a philosophy article (which is usually American). The illusion of rigour.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [pursuit of definition is hopeless or pointless]:

Some fools think you cannot define anything, but only say what it is like [Antisthenes (I), by Aristotle]
No a priori concept can be defined [Kant]
The use of mathematical-style definitions in philosophy is fruitless and harmful [Husserl]
Definition by analysis into constituents is useless, because it neglects the whole [Russell]
In mathematics definitions are superfluous, as they name classes, and it all reduces to primitives [Russell]
We have no successful definitions, because they all use indefinable words [Fodor]
How do we determine which of the sentences containing a term comprise its definition? [Horwich]
Most people can't even define a chair [Peacocke]
Philosophical concepts are rarely defined, and are not understood by means of definitions [Sider]
It seems possible for a correct definition to be factually incorrect, as in defining 'contact' [Sider]
Feminists warn that ideologies use timeless objective definitions as a tool of repression [Davies,S]