more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22374

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 4. Responsibility for Actions ]

Full Idea

Where actions proceed not from some cause in the characters and dispositions of the person who performed them, they infix not themselves upon him, and can neither redound to his honour if good, nor infamy if evil. The action in itself may be blameable.

Gist of Idea

You can only hold people responsible for actions which arise out of their character

Source

David Hume (Treatise of Human Nature [1739], II.III.2), quoted by Philippa Foot - Free Will as Involving Determinism p.70

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Virtues and Vices' [Blackwell 1981], p.70


A Reaction

I agree with Foot that this is wrong. Uncharacteristic actions still reflect on the person. The last sentence is wrong too. If you ignore the agent of an action, it can't be distinguished from a flash of lightning.


The 30 ideas with the same theme [whether motives were sufficiently good]:

If you repent of an act done through ignorance, you acted involuntarily, not non-voluntarily [Aristotle]
For Aristotle responsibility seems negative, in the absence of force or ignorance [Irwin on Aristotle]
An action is voluntary when it is accompanied by thought of some kind [Aristotle]
We are responsible if our actions reflect our motivation [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Our own choices are autonomous, and the basis for praise and blame [Epicurus]
Stoics said responsibility depends on rationality [Stoic school, by Sorabji]
Epictetus developed a notion of will as the source of our responsibility [Epictetus, by Frede,M]
We do not praise the acts of an efficient automaton, as their acts are necessary [Descartes]
The greatest perfection of man is to act by free will, and thus merit praise or blame [Descartes]
We are the source of an action if only our nature can explain the action [Spinoza]
We act when it follows from our nature, and is understood in that way [Spinoza]
We love or hate people more strongly because we think they are free [Spinoza]
Praise and blame can only be given if an action proceeds from a person's character and disposition [Hume]
You can only hold people responsible for actions which arise out of their character [Hume]
Actions done for a purpose are least understood, because we complacently think it's obvious [Nietzsche]
Judging actions by intentions - like judging painters by their thoughts! [Nietzsche]
Nietzsche failed to see that moral actions can be voluntary without free will [Foot on Nietzsche]
My freedom increases as I broaden my vision of possiblities and motives [Jaspers]
We could only be responsible if we had consented before birth to who we are [Cioran]
Responsibility seems to conflict with events being either caused or not caused [Chisholm]
Desires may rule us, but are we responsible for our desires? [Chisholm]
Responsibility involves cause, intention, state of mind, and response after the event [Williams,B]
Criminal responsibility can be fully assigned to each member of a group [Walzer]
Liberals say we are only responsible for fully autonomous actions [Kekes]
Collective responsibility conflicts with responsibility's requirement of authonomy [Kekes]
We may still admire a person's character even if the traits are involuntary [Statman]
People's actions are explained either by their motives, or their reasons, or the causes [Lowe]
There may be a justification relative to a person's view, and yet no absolute justification [Stout,R]
An action is only yours if you produce it, rather than some state or event within you [Stout,R]
Legal excuses are duress, ignorance, and diminished responsibility [McMahan]