more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Supporters of double effect say that sometimes it makes a difference to the permissibility of an action involving harm to others that this harm, although foreseen, is not part of the agent's intention.
Gist of Idea
The doctrine of double effect can excuse an outcome because it wasn't directly intended
Source
Philippa Foot (Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect [1967], p.22)
Book Ref
Foot,Philippa: 'Virtues and Vices' [Blackwell 1981], p.22
A Reaction
The obvious major case is the direction of wartime bombing raids. Controversial, because how can someone foresee a side effect and yet claim to have no intention to cause it? Isn't it wickedly self-deluding?
Related Idea
Idea 22384 A 'double effect' is a foreseen but not desired side-effect, which may be forgivable [Foot]
22384 | A 'double effect' is a foreseen but not desired side-effect, which may be forgivable [Foot] |
22385 | The doctrine of double effect can excuse an outcome because it wasn't directly intended [Foot] |
22386 | Double effect says foreseeing you will kill someone is not the same as intending it [Foot] |
22387 | Without double effect, bad men can make us do evil by threatening something worse [Foot] |
22388 | Double effect seems to rely on a distinction between what we do and what we allow [Foot] |
22466 | We see a moral distinction between our aims and their foreseen consequences [Foot] |
22465 | We see a moral distinction between doing and allowing to happen [Foot] |
22467 | Acts and omissions only matter if they concern doing something versus allowing it [Foot] |
23578 | Double Effect needs a double intention - to achieve the good, and minimise the evil [Walzer] |
4657 | Double Effect: no bad acts with good consequences, but possibly good acts despite bad consequences [Glover] |
6896 | Double effect is the distinction between what is foreseen and what is intended [Mautner] |
6897 | Double effect acts need goodness, unintended evil, good not caused by evil, and outweighing [Mautner] |
7293 | It is legitimate to do harm if it is the unintended side-effect of an effort to achieve a good [Grayling] |
20068 | Describing a death as a side-effect rather than a goal may just be good public relations [Stout,R] |