more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 22428

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 2. Qualities in Perception / b. Primary/secondary ]

Full Idea

To grasp what it is to be red is to know the kind of sensory experience red things produce; ...but it is not true that to grasp what it is to be square one needs to know what kinds of sensory experience square things produce.

Gist of Idea

You understood being red if you know the experience involved; not so with thngs being square

Source

Colin McGinn (Subjective View: sec qualities and indexicals [1983], 8)

Book Ref

McGinn,Colin: 'The Subjective View' [OUP 1983], p.138


A Reaction

Are any experiences involved in the understanding of squareness? We don't know squareness by a priori intuition (do we?). To grasp squareness if may be necessary to have a variety of experiences of it. Or to grasp that it is primary.


The 19 ideas from 'Subjective View: sec qualities and indexicals'

Being red simply consists in looking red [McGinn]
Relativity means differing secondary perceptions are not real disagreements [McGinn]
Phenomenalism is correct for secondary qualities, so scepticism is there impossible [McGinn]
Lockean secondary qualities (unlike primaries) produce particular sensory experiences [McGinn]
You don't need to know how a square thing looks or feels to understand squareness [McGinn]
Indexical thought is in relation to my self-consciousness [McGinn]
Indexicals do not figure in theories of physics, because they are not explanatory causes [McGinn]
I can know indexical truths a priori, unlike their non-indexical paraphrases [McGinn]
The indexical perspective is subjective, incorrigible and constant [McGinn]
Touch doesn't provide direct experience of primary qualities, because touch feels temperature [McGinn]
We can perceive objectively, because primary qualities are not mind-created [McGinn]
Indexical concepts are indispensable, as we need them for the power to act [McGinn]
Could there be a mind which lacked secondary quality perception? [McGinn]
Secondary qualities contain information; their variety would be superfluous otherwise [McGinn]
The utility theory says secondary qualities give information useful to human beings [McGinn]
Maybe all possible sense experience must involve both secondary and primary qualities [McGinn]
To explain object qualities, primary qualities must be more than mere sources of experience [McGinn]
You understood being red if you know the experience involved; not so with thngs being square [McGinn]
We see objects 'directly' by representing them [McGinn]