more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
It would be more honest to recognise that the 'should' of moral judgement is sometimes merely an instrument by which we (for our own very good reasons) try to impose a rule of conduct even on the uncaring man?
Gist of Idea
We sometimes just use the word 'should' to impose a rule of conduct on someone
Source
Philippa Foot (Morality and Art [1972], p.18)
Book Ref
Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.18
A Reaction
This is a good example, I think, of the ordinary language tradition that Foot grew up in. We load a word like 'should' with a mystical power, but the situations in which it is actually used bring us back down to earth.
22448 | We sometimes just use the word 'should' to impose a rule of conduct on someone [Foot] |
22444 | A moral system must deal with the dangers and benefits of life [Foot] |
22446 | In the case of something lacking independence, calling it a human being is a matter of choice [Foot] |
22445 | Morality shows murder is wrong, but not what counts as a murder [Foot] |
22447 | Saying something 'just is' right or wrong creates an illusion of fact and objectivity [Foot] |