more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22453

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / f. Ethical non-cognitivism ]

Full Idea

Williams insisted that the feelings we have in situations of moral conflict show that the 'structure' of moral judgements is unlike that of assertions expressing beliefs.

Gist of Idea

Moral conflicts have a different feeling and structure from belief conflicts

Source

report of Bernard Williams (Ethical consistency [1965]) by Philippa Foot - Moral Realism and Moral Dilemma p.36

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.36


A Reaction

Foot presents this as a key reason for the non-cognitivist view of ethics, and her paper attacks it. I don't usually react to moral disagreement with the same vigour I have when I think a belief is untrue. It may just be uncertainty, though.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [there is no objective knowledge about ethics]:

Whether nature is beautiful or orderly is entirely in relation to human imagination [Spinoza]
Morality is merely interpretations, which are extra-moral in origin [Nietzsche]
Philosophers hate values having an origin, and want values to be self-sufficient [Nietzsche]
There are no moral facts, and moralists believe in realities which do not exist [Nietzsche]
Non-cognitivists give the conditions of use of moral sentences as facts about the speaker [Foot]
The 'error theory' of morals says there is no moral knowledge, because there are no moral facts [Mackie, by Engel]
We tolerate inconsistency in ethics but not in other beliefs (which reflect an independent order) [Williams,B, by Foot]
Moral conflicts have a different feeling and structure from belief conflicts [Williams,B, by Foot]
If moral systems can't judge other moral systems, then moral relativism is true [Williams,B, by Foot]
Noncognitivism tries to avoid both naturalism and mysterious morality [Hacker-Wright]