more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22454

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / f. Ethical non-cognitivism ]

Full Idea

Williams argued that we can tolerate inconsistency in moral principles though not in assertions, and that this is explained by the fact that it is the concern of the latter but not of the former to reflect an 'independent order of things'.

Gist of Idea

We tolerate inconsistency in ethics but not in other beliefs (which reflect an independent order)

Source

report of Bernard Williams (Consistency and realism (with 1972 note) [1966]) by Philippa Foot - Moral Realism and Moral Dilemma p.37

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.37


A Reaction

Put like this, Williams seems to beg the question, which is whether there is an independent moral order to things. There seems to be an easy answer, which is that we are only intolerant of inconsistency when we are confident about it.

Related Idea

Idea 22453 Moral conflicts have a different feeling and structure from belief conflicts [Williams,B, by Foot]


The 65 ideas from Bernard Williams

We tolerate inconsistency in ethics but not in other beliefs (which reflect an independent order) [Williams,B, by Foot]
Utilitarianism cannot make any serious sense of integrity [Williams,B]
Maybe the unthinkable is a moral category, and considering some options is dishonourable or absurd [Williams,B]
Consequentialism assumes that situations can be compared [Williams,B]
For a consequentialist massacring 7 million must be better than massacring 7 million and one [Williams,B]
We don't have a duty to ensure that others do their duty [Williams,B]
Obligation and duty look backwards (because of a promise or job), although the acts are in the future [Williams,B]
'Deon' in Greek means what one must do; there was no word meaning 'duty' [Williams,B]
A crucial feature of moral thought is second-order desire - the desire to have certain desires [Williams,B]
Philosophers try to produce ethical theories because they falsely assume that ethics can be simple [Williams,B]
A weakness of contractual theories is the position of a person of superior ability and power [Williams,B]
It is an error of consequentialism to think we just aim at certain states of affairs; we also want to act [Williams,B]
Why should I think of myself as both the legislator and the citizen who follows the laws? [Williams,B]
If the self becomes completely impartial, it no longer has enough identity to worry about its interests [Williams,B]
Utilitarian benevolence involves no particular attachments, and is immune to the inverse square law [Williams,B]
Most women see an early miscarriage and a late stillbirth as being very different in character [Williams,B]
Speciesism isn't like racism, because the former implies a viewpoint which belongs to no one [Williams,B]
The category of person is a weak basis for ethics, because it is not fixed but comes in degrees [Williams,B]
Intuitionism has been demolished by critics, and no longer looks interesting [Williams,B]
The weakness of prescriptivism is shown by "I simply don't like staying at good hotels" [Williams,B]
Some ethical ideas, such as 'treachery' and 'promise', seem to express a union of facts and values [Williams,B]
It is very confused to deduce a nonrelativist morality of universal toleration from relativism [Williams,B]
Our ability to react to an alien culture shows that ethical thought extends beyond cultural boundaries [Williams,B]
Ethical conviction must be to some extent passive, and can't just depend on the will and decisions [Williams,B]
Taking responsibility won't cure ethical uncertainty by; we are uncertain what to decide [Williams,B]
It is a mark of our having ethical values that we aim to reproduce them in our children [Williams,B]
Promise keeping increases reliability, by making deliberation focus on something which would be overlooked [Williams,B]
The concept of a 'duty to myself' is fraudulent [Williams,B]
"Ought implies can" is a famous formula in connection with moral obligation [Williams,B]
Not all moral deliberations lead to obligations; some merely reveal what 'may' be done [Williams,B]
In the realist view, the real external world explains how it (and perceptions of it) are possible [Williams,B]
Moral conflicts have a different feeling and structure from belief conflicts [Williams,B, by Foot]
Many ethical theories neglect the power of regretting the ought not acted upon [Williams,B]
Blame usually has no effect if the recipient thinks it unjustified [Williams,B]
Blame partly rests on the fiction that blamed agents always know their obligations [Williams,B]
Equality seems to require that each person be acknowledged as having a significant point of view [Williams,B]
Equality implies that people are alike in potential as well as in needs [Williams,B]
It is a mark of extreme exploitation that the sufferers do not realise their plight [Williams,B]
Equality of opportunity without equality of respect would create a very inhuman society [Williams,B]
Reasons are 'internal' if they give a person a motive to act, but 'external' otherwise [Williams,B]
If all that matters in morality is motive and intention, that makes moral luck irrelevant [Williams,B]
Emotivism saw morality as expressing emotions, and influencing others' emotions [Williams,B]
Reference to a person's emotions is often essential to understanding their actions [Williams,B]
Moral education must involve learning about various types of feeling towards things [Williams,B]
An admirable human being should have certain kinds of emotional responses [Williams,B]
Kant's love of consistency is too rigid, and it even overrides normal fairness [Williams,B]
For utilitarians states of affairs are what have value, not matter who produced them [Williams,B]
It is important that a person can change their character, and not just be successive 'selves' [Williams,B]
Kantians have an poor account of individuals, and insist on impartiality, because they ignore character [Williams,B]
The memory criterion has a problem when one thing branches into two things [Williams,B, by Macdonald,C]
'Dead person' isn't a contradiction, so 'person' is somewhat vague [Williams,B]
You can only really love a person as a token, not as a type [Williams,B]
Necessity implies possibility, but in experience it matters which comes first [Williams,B]
We judge weakness of will by an assessment after the event is concluded [Williams,B, by Cottingham]
Greek moral progress came when 'virtue' was freed from social status [Williams,B]
The modern idea of duty is unknown in archaic Greece [Williams,B]
Responsibility involves cause, intention, state of mind, and response after the event [Williams,B]
There is only a problem of free will if you think the notion of 'voluntary' can be metaphysically deepened [Williams,B]
There is a problem of evil only if you expect the world to be good [Williams,B]
If reason cannot lead people to good, we must hope they have an internal voice [Williams,B]
In bad actions, guilt points towards victims, and shame to the agent [Williams,B]
If the moral self is seen as characterless, then other people have a very limited role in our moral lives [Williams,B]
It is an absurd Kantian idea that at the limit rationality and freedom coincide [Williams,B]
If moral systems can't judge other moral systems, then moral relativism is true [Williams,B, by Foot]
We can't accept Aristotle's naturalism about persons, because it is normative and unscientific [Williams,B, by Hursthouse]