more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
We should ask why we think that it makes sense to talk about morally good and bad states of affairs.
Gist of Idea
Why might we think that a state of affairs can be morally good or bad?
Source
Philippa Foot (Utilitarianism and the Virtues [1985], p.68)
Book Ref
Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.68
A Reaction
This is the key question in her attack on consequentialism. There is nothing 'morally' good about my football team winning a great victory.
| 22458 | Consequentialists can hurt the innocent in order to prevent further wickedness [Foot] |
| 22459 | For consequentialism, it is irrational to follow a rule which in this instance ends badly [Foot] |
| 22460 | Why might we think that a state of affairs can be morally good or bad? [Foot] |
| 22461 | Good outcomes are not external guides to morality, but a part of virtuous actions [Foot] |
| 22462 | We should speak the truth, but also preserve and pursue it [Foot] |
| 22463 | Morality is seen as tacit legislation by the community [Foot] |
| 22464 | The idea of a good state of affairs has no role in the thought of Aristotle, Rawls or Scanlon [Foot] |