more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 22476

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 1. Virtue Theory / d. Virtue theory critique ]

Full Idea

Nietzsche believed, in effect, that as the facts of human psychology really were, there could be no such thing as human virtues, dispositions good in any man.

Gist of Idea

Nietzsche thought our psychology means there can't be universal human virtues

Source

report of Friedrich Nietzsche (Works (refs to 8 vol Colli and Montinari) [1885]) by Philippa Foot - Nietzsche's Immoralism p.157

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.157

A Reaction

Presumably each individual can only have virtues appropriate to their individual nature, which is something like channelling their personal psychological drives. Can't we each have our individual version of courage or honesty?

The 20 ideas with the same theme [reasons against virtue theory]:

3548 Aristotle neglects the place of rules in the mature virtuous person [Annas on Aristotle]
1581 Greeks elevate virtues enormously, but never explain them [Descartes]
3544 Kant thinks virtue becomes passive, and hence morally unaccountable [Kant, by Annas]
5289 When aristocracy or the bourgeoisie dominate, certain values dominate with them [Marx/Engels]
20375 Virtues must be highly personal; if not, it is merely respect for a concept [Nietzsche]
2881 Virtue has been greatly harmed by the boringness of its advocates [Nietzsche]
24132 After Socrates virtue is misunderstood, as good for all, not for individuals [Nietzsche]
20198 Many virtues are harmful traps, but that is why other people praise them [Nietzsche]
20103 You are mastered by your own virtues, but you must master them, and turn them into tools [Nietzsche]
7165 Virtue is wasteful, as it reduces us all to being one another's nurse [Nietzsche]
7193 Virtue for everyone removes its charm of being exceptional and aristocratic [Nietzsche]
22476 Nietzsche thought our psychology means there can't be universal human virtues [Nietzsche, by Foot]
9260 Virtues won't generate an obligation, so it isn't a basis for morality [Prichard]
23692 Good and bad are a matter of actions, not of internal dispositions [Foot]
16956 To explain generosity in a person, you must understand a generous action [Dummett]
7097 Virtue is secondary to a role-figure, defined within a culture [MacIntyre, by Statman]
7101 Virtue theory needs an external standard to judge behaviour and character [Inwagen, by Statman]
4334 Virtue ethics is open to the objection that it fails to show priority among the virtues [Hursthouse]
7100 Virtue theory isn't a genuine ethical theory, because it doesn't have universal application [Statman]
7102 Promises create moral duties that have nothing to do with character [Statman]