more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 22477

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / h. Expressivism ]

Full Idea

No one thinks that calling a knife a good knife, a farmer a good farmer, a speech a good speech, a root a good root, necessarily expresses or even involves an attitude or feeling towards it.

Gist of Idea

Calling a knife or farmer or speech or root good does not involve attitudes or feelings

Source

Philippa Foot (Rationality and Virtue [1994], p.163)

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.163


A Reaction

This is the Aristotelian idea (which I favour) that good derives from function. In such a case it seems obvious that it has nothing to do with expressing emotions.

Related Idea

Idea 22478 The essential thing is the 'needs' of plants and animals, and their operative parts [Foot]


The 4 ideas from 'Rationality and Virtue'

Calling a knife or farmer or speech or root good does not involve attitudes or feelings [Foot]
The essential thing is the 'needs' of plants and animals, and their operative parts [Foot]
Observing justice is necessary to humans, like hunting to wolves or dancing to bees [Foot]
Possessing the virtue of justice disposes a person to good practical rationality [Foot]