more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
I do not see how …we can know how to interpret the idea of a situation in which someone will necessarily be wrong whatever he does.
Gist of Idea
I can't understand how someone can be necessarily wrong whatever he does
Source
Philippa Foot (Moral Dilemmas Revisited [1995], p.188)
Book Ref
Foot,Philippa: 'Moral Dilemmas' [OUP 2002], p.188
A Reaction
Seems right. If you think of hideous dilemmas (frequent in wartime), there must always be a right thing to do (or two equally right things to do), even if the outcome is fairly hideous. Just distinguish the right from the good.
| 5212 | A man should sooner die than do some dreadful things, no matter how cruel the death [Aristotle] |
| 21103 | Moral questions can only be decided by common opinion [Hume] |
| 22481 | There is no restitution after a dilemma, if it only involved the agent, or just needed an explanation [Foot, by PG] |
| 22482 | I can't understand how someone can be necessarily wrong whatever he does [Foot] |
| 22455 | Many ethical theories neglect the power of regretting the ought not acted upon [Williams,B] |
| 4656 | A problem arises in any moral system that allows more than one absolute right [Glover] |
| 4329 | After a moral dilemma is resolved there is still a 'remainder', requiring (say) regret [Hursthouse] |
| 4330 | Deontologists resolve moral dilemmas by saying the rule conflict is merely apparent [Hursthouse] |
| 4341 | Involuntary actions performed in tragic dilemmas are bad because they mar a good life [Hursthouse] |
| 4340 | You are not a dishonest person if a tragic dilemma forces you to do something dishonest [Hursthouse] |
| 20877 | Errors in moral practice might be inconsistent or inappropriate principles, or inappropriate application [LaFollette] |
| 20878 | We can discuss the criteria of a judgment, or the weight given to them, or their application [LaFollette] |