more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 22491

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / B. Value / 1. Nature of Value / b. Fact and value ]

Full Idea

A moral evaluation does not stand over against the statement of a matter of fact, but rather has to do with facts about a particular subject matter, as do evaluations of such things as sight and hearing in animals.

Gist of Idea

Moral evaluations are not separate from facts, but concern particular facts about functioning

Source

Philippa Foot (Natural Goodness [2001], 1)

Book Ref

Foot,Philippa: 'Natural Goodness' [OUP 2003], p.24


A Reaction

She avoids the word 'function', and only deals with living creatures, but she uses a 'good knife' as an example, and this Aristotelian view clearly applies to any machine which has a function.


The 14 ideas from 'Natural Goodness'

Moral reason is not just neutral, because morality is part of the standard of rationality [Foot, by Hacker-Wright]
Moral virtues arise from human nature, as part of what makes us good human beings [Foot, by Hacker-Wright]
Moral evaluations are not separate from facts, but concern particular facts about functioning [Foot]
Practical rationality must weigh both what is morally and what is non-morally required [Foot]
Good actions can never be justified by the good they brings to their agent [Foot]
All criterions of practical rationality derive from goodness of will [Foot]
Virtues are as necessary to humans as stings are to bees [Foot]
Sterility is a human defect, but the choice to be childless is not [Foot]
Wisdom only implies the knowledge achievable in any normal lifetime [Foot]
Someone is a good person because of their rational will, not their body or memory [Foot]
Deep happiness usually comes from the basic things in life [Foot]
Happiness is enjoying the pursuit and attainment of right ends [Foot]
We all know that just pretending to be someone's friend is not the good life [Foot]
Refraining from murder is not made good by authenticity or self-fulfilment [Foot]