more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22581

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / A. Basis of a State / 2. Population / b. State population ]

Full Idea

The best defining mark of a city is the greatest excess of multitude with a view to self-sufficiency in living that can easily be surveyed as a whole. Let the size of the city, then, be determined in this way.

Gist of Idea

The size of a city is decided by the maximum self-sufficient community that can be surveyed

Source

Aristotle (Politics [c.332 BCE], 1326b23)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Politics', ed/tr. Reeve,C.D.C. [Hackett 2017], p.165


A Reaction

Modern states have presumably far exceeded to self-sufficiency test. The requirement to be 'surveyed' presumably implies that the state can be controlled. Modern technology means almost no limit to such a size.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [appropriate size of a state's population]:

The size of a city is decided by the maximum self-sufficient community that can be surveyed [Aristotle]
In small republics citizens identify with the public good, and abuses are fewer [Montesquieu]
In a large republic there is too much wealth for individuals to manage it [Montesquieu]
A state must be big enough to preserve itself, but small enough to be governable [Rousseau]
Too much land is a struggle, producing defensive war; too little makes dependence, and offensive war [Rousseau]
If the state enlarges, the creators of the general will become less individually powerful [Rousseau]
If the population is larger, the government needs to be more powerful [Rousseau]
Vast empires are bad for well-being and freedom, though they may promote glory [Tocqueville]
People would be much happier and freer in small nations [Tocqueville]
The economic and political advantages of great size seem to have no upper limit [Russell]