more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22720

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / B. Contract Ethics / 7. Prisoner's Dilemma ]

Full Idea

Prisoners A and B can support or betray one another. If both support, they each get 1 year in prison. If one betrays, the betrayer gets 0 and the betrayed gets 3. If they both betray they get 2 each. The common good is to support each other.

Gist of Idea

Two prisoners get the best result by being loyal, not by selfish betrayal

Source

William Poundstone (Prisoner's Dilemma [1992], 06 'Tucker's')

Book Ref

Poundstone,William: 'Prisoner's Dilemma' [OUP 1992], p.118


A Reaction

[by Albert Tucker, highly compressed] The classic Prisoner's Dilemma. It is artificial, but demonstrates that selfish behaviour gets a bad result (total of four years imprisonment), but the common good gets only two years. Every child should study this!


The 3 ideas with the same theme [situations where being rational brings failure]:

The first performer in a contract is handing himself over to an enemy [Hobbes]
Two prisoners get the best result by being loyal, not by selfish betrayal [Poundstone]
The tragedy in prisoner's dilemma is when two 'nice' players misread each other [Poundstone]