more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22734

[filed under theme 28. God / B. Proving God / 1. Proof of God ]

Full Idea

Arguments for God have four modes: from universal agreement, from the orderly arrangement of the universe, from the absurd consequences of denying God, and from undermining the opposing arguments.

Gist of Idea

God is defended by agreement, order, absurdity of denying God, and refutations

Source

Sextus Empiricus (Against the Physicists (two books) [c.180], I.060)

Book Ref

Sextus Empiricus: 'Against the Physicists/Against the Ethicists', ed/tr. Bury,R.G. [Harvard Loeb 1997], p.35


A Reaction

[compressed] The loss of status of the argument from universal agreement has had a huge influence. We now realise that a very wide consensus is no guarantee of truth in anything.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [using reason to convince of God's existence]:

For Aristotle God is defined in an axiom, for which there is no proof [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
God is defended by agreement, order, absurdity of denying God, and refutations [Sext.Empiricus]
God has given us no innate idea of himself [Locke]
Without the principle of sufficient reason, God's existence could not be demonstrated [Leibniz]
There must be a God, because all sensible things must be perceived by him [Berkeley]
There must be a God, because I and my ideas are not independent [Berkeley]
The objects of theological reasoning are too big for our minds [Hume]
Only three proofs of God: the physico-theological (evidence), the cosmological (existence), the ontological (a priori) [Kant]
The God of revealed religion can only be understood through pure speculative knowledge [Hegel]
If the God hypothesis works well, then it is true [James]
'Natural theology' aims to prove God to anyone (not just believers) by reason or argument [Davies,B]