more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 22813

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 4. Property rights ]

Full Idea

It is standardly said that we need the right to property as an essential underpinning of life, but this is patently not true. …In reality it is actually seen as an essential part of a life of independence.

Gist of Idea

Property is not essential for life, but it may be essential for independence

Source

Charles Taylor (Atomism [1979], p.41)

Book Ref

'Communitarianism and Individualism', ed/tr. Avineri,S. /de-Shalit,A. [OUP 1992], p.41


A Reaction

Hence it has a high value for liberals, for whom an independent life is the prime social aspiration. The law of trespass will define the degree of independence provided by property.


The 8 ideas from 'Atomism'

If the state is neutral, there won't be sufficient community to support a welfare state [Taylor,C, by Kymlicka]
The social contract sees society as constituted by and for individuals [Taylor,C]
Assigning a right based on a human capacity implies that the capacity should be developed [Taylor,C]
A right is not just a rule, but also asserts certain ideas of moral worth [Taylor,C]
For most people the primacy of rights mainly concerns freedom [Taylor,C]
Property is not essential for life, but it may be essential for independence [Taylor,C]
Our reliance on other people close to us does not imply any political obligations [Taylor,C]
If freedom depends on society and culture, the greatest freedom is in shaping them [Taylor,C]