more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 22845

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 4. Economic equality ]

Full Idea

The introduction of money allows people to accumulate wealth without limit. Since money only works through everyone's agreement …everyone can be taken to have agreed to the consequences of money in the unequal distribution of wealth.

Gist of Idea

Money allows unlimited inequalities, and we obviously all agree to money

Source

John Charvet (Liberalism: the basics [2019], 11)

Book Ref

Charvet,John: 'Liberalism: the basics' [Routledge 2019], p.145


A Reaction

[Locke] Presumably large inequalities of possessions and territory were possible before money, but there was at least an upper limit. The current owner of Amazon may end up with more wealth than the whole of the rest of humanity combined.

Related Idea

Idea 22798 Money is the best way to achieve just equality [Hegel]


The 27 ideas from 'Liberalism: the basics'

Liberalism asserts maximum freedom, but that must be equal for all participants [Charvet]
Liberals promote community and well-being - because all good societies need them [Charvet]
The rule of law mainly benefits those with property and liberties [Charvet]
The rule of law is mainly to restrict governments [Charvet]
The 1689 Bill of Rights denied the monarch new courts, or the right to sit as judge [Charvet]
From 1701 only parliament could remove judges, whose decisions could not be discussed [Charvet]
Justice superior to the rule of law is claimed on behalf of the workers, or the will of the nation [Charvet]
Allowing defamatory speech is against society's interests, by blurring which people are trustworthy [Charvet]
Modern libertarian societies still provide education and some housing [Charvet]
Welfare is needed if citizens are to accept the obligations of a liberal state [Charvet]
Give by ability and receive by need, rather than a free labour market [Charvet]
Egalitarian liberals prefer equality (either of input or outcome) to liberty [Charvet]
Liberals value freedom and equality, but the society itself must decide on its values [Charvet]
Liberalism needs people to either have equal autonomy, or everyone to have enough autonomy [Charvet]
Societies need shared values, so conservatism is right if rational discussion of values is impossible [Charvet]
'Freedom from' is an empty idea, if the freedom is not from impediments to my desires [Charvet]
Positive freedom can lead to coercion, if you are forced to do what you chose to do [Charvet]
Identity multiculturalism emerges from communitarianism, preferring community to humanity [Charvet]
For communitarians it seems that you must accept the culture you are born into [Charvet]
Mere equality, as in two trees being the same height, has no value at all [Charvet]
Inequalities are worse if they seem to be your fault, rather than social facts [Charvet]
First level autonomy is application of personal values; second level is criticising them [Charvet]
Money allows unlimited inequalities, and we obviously all agree to money [Charvet]
The universalism of utilitarianism implies a world state [Charvet]
Rawls's theory cannot justify liberalism, since it presupposes free and equal participants [Charvet]
People with strong prior beliefs would have nothing to do with a veil of ignorance [Charvet]
Kant places a higher value on the universal rational will than on the people asserting it [Charvet]