more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22891

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 3. Parts of Time / e. Present moment ]

Full Idea

Russell suggested, in defence of an empiricist theory of time-awareness, that a sense organ goes on vibrating, like a piano string, for while after the stimulation. Thus we can see the movement of a second hand, seen in several places at once.

Gist of Idea

We could be aware of time if senses briefly vibrated, extending their experience of movement

Source

report of Bertrand Russell (An Outline of Philosophy [1927]) by Adrian Bardon - Brief History of the Philosophy of Time 2 'Realism'

Book Ref

Bardon,Adrian: 'Brief History of the Philosophy of Time' [OUP 2013], p.39


A Reaction

Hm. If they were vibrating the last experience, they couldn't pick up the new one. When something fast happens the brain resonates fortissimo! If your eyes are moving it will be different neurons that get fired at each instant.

Related Idea

Idea 22892 Experiences of motion may be overlapping, thus stretching out the experience [Bardon]


The 13 ideas with the same theme [nature of the present moment of time]:

We can't tell whether the changing present moment is one thing, or a succession of things [Aristotle]
The present moment is a link (of past to future), and also a limit (of past and of future) [Aristotle]
The present does not exist, so our immediate experience is actually part past and part future [Chrysippus, by Plutarch]
Time is continous and infinitely divisible, so there cannot be a wholly present time [Chrysippus, by Stobaeus]
Socrates either dies when he exists (before his death) or when he doesn't (after his death) [Sext.Empiricus]
If the present is just the limit of the past or the future, it can't exist because they don't exist [Sext.Empiricus]
We could be aware of time if senses briefly vibrated, extending their experience of movement [Russell, by Bardon]
In relativity the length of the 'present moment' is relative to distance from the observer [Heisenberg]
The pure present moment is too brief to be experienced [Armstrong]
The present is the collapse of the light wavefront from the Big Bang [Ellis]
If time is infinitely divisible, then the present must be infinitely short [Le Poidevin]
The moving spotlight says entities can have properties of being present, past or future [Baron/Miller]
The present moment is a matter of existence, not of acquiring a property [Baron/Miller]