more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
If we accept the static (B-series) view, we have to reevaluate how we think about causation, natural laws, and scientific explanation.
Gist of Idea
The B-series needs a revised view of causes, laws and explanations
Source
Adrian Bardon (Brief History of the Philosophy of Time [2013], 4 'Pervasive')
Book Ref
Bardon,Adrian: 'Brief History of the Philosophy of Time' [OUP 2013], p.99
A Reaction
Any scientific account which refers to events seems to imply a dynamic view of time. Lots of scientists and philosophers endorse the static view of time, but then fail to pursue its implications.
Related Idea
Idea 8968 If the flagpole causally explains the shadow, the shadow cannot explain the flagpole [Lowe]
13713 | Quine holds time to be 'space-like': past objects are as real as spatially remote ones [Quine, by Sider] |
15193 | The new tenseless theory offers indexical truth-conditions, instead of a reductive analysis [Le Poidevin] |
15066 | B-theorists say tensed sentences have an unfilled argument-place for a time [Fine,K] |
22938 | To say that the past causes the present needs them both to be equally real [Le Poidevin] |
22940 | If the B-universe is eternal, why am I trapped in a changing moment of it? [Le Poidevin] |
22939 | The B-series doesn't seem to allow change [Le Poidevin] |
14734 | The B-series involves eternalism, and the reduction of tense [Sider] |
14736 | The B-theory is adequate, except that it omits to say which time is present [Sider] |
22901 | The B-series needs a revised view of causes, laws and explanations [Bardon] |
22896 | The B-series is realist about time, but idealist about its passage [Bardon] |
22903 | The B-series adds directionality when it accepts 'earlier' and 'later' [Bardon] |
23007 | The B-series can have a direction, as long as it does not arise from temporal flow [Baron/Miller] |