more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 22919

[filed under theme 7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 3. Being / d. Non-being ]

Full Idea

It is a powerful argument for something's non-existence that it would make absolutely no difference.

Gist of Idea

A thing which makes no difference seems unlikely to exist

Source

Robin Le Poidevin (Travels in Four Dimensions [2003], 02 'Everything')

Book Ref

Le Poidevin,Robin: 'Travels in Four Dimensions' [OUP 2003], p.27


A Reaction

Powerful, but not conclusive. Neutrinos don't seem to do much, so it isn't far from there to get a particle which does nothing.

Related Idea

Idea 7022 To be is to have a capacity, to act on other things, or to receive actions [Plato]


The 48 ideas from Robin Le Poidevin

It is disturbing if we become unreal when we die, but if time is unreal, then we remain real after death [Le Poidevin]
A-theory says past, present, future and flow exist; B-theory says this just reports our perspective [Le Poidevin]
Existentialism focuses on freedom and self-making, and insertion into the world [Le Poidevin]
In the tenseless view, all times are equally real, so statements of the future have truth-values [Le Poidevin]
It is claimed that the tense view entails the unreality of both future and past [Le Poidevin]
If things don't persist through time, then change makes no sense [Le Poidevin]
Things which have ceased change their A-series position; things that persist change their B-series position [Le Poidevin]
At the very least, minds themselves seem to be tensed [Le Poidevin]
We share a common now, but not a common here [Le Poidevin]
Evil can't be an illusion, because then the illusion that there is evil would be evil [Le Poidevin]
The new tenseless theory offers indexical truth-conditions, instead of a reductive analysis [Le Poidevin]
If the future is not real, we don't seem to have any obligation to future individuals [Le Poidevin]
God being inside or outside of time both raise a group of difficult problems [Le Poidevin]
Fiction seems to lack a tensed perspective, and offers an example of tenseless language [Le Poidevin]
In the B-series, time-positions are unchanging; in the A-series they change (from future to present to past) [Le Poidevin]
Tensed theorists typically try to reduce the tenseless to the tensed [Le Poidevin]
It is the view of the future that really decides between tensed and tenseless views of time [Le Poidevin]
We want illuminating theories, rather than coherent theories [Le Poidevin]
A thing which makes no difference seems unlikely to exist [Le Poidevin]
Since nothing occurs in a temporal vacuum, there is no way to measure its length [Le Poidevin]
Temporal vacuums would be unexperienced, unmeasured, and unending [Le Poidevin]
We can identify unoccupied points in space, so they must exist [Le Poidevin]
Absolute space explains actual and potential positions, and geometrical truths [Le Poidevin]
If spatial points exist, then they must be stationary, by definition [Le Poidevin]
For relationists moving an object beyond the edge of space creates new space [Le Poidevin]
The logical properties of causation are asymmetry, transitivity and irreflexivity [Le Poidevin]
In addition to causal explanations, they can also be inferential, or definitional, or purposive [Le Poidevin]
The present is the past/future boundary, so the first moment of time was not present [Le Poidevin]
If the present could have diverse pasts, then past truths can't have present truthmakers [Le Poidevin]
To say that the past causes the present needs them both to be equally real [Le Poidevin]
Time can't speed up or slow down, so it doesn't seem to be a 'process' [Le Poidevin]
We don't just describe a time as 'now' from a private viewpoint, but as a fact about the world [Le Poidevin]
We distinguish time from space, because it passes, and it has a unique present moment [Le Poidevin]
The B-series doesn't seem to allow change [Le Poidevin]
If the B-universe is eternal, why am I trapped in a changing moment of it? [Le Poidevin]
The primitive parts of time are intervals, not instants [Le Poidevin]
If time is infinitely divisible, then the present must be infinitely short [Le Poidevin]
Instantaneous motion is an intrinsic disposition to be elsewhere [Le Poidevin]
How could a timeless God know what time it is? So could God be both timeless and omniscient? [Le Poidevin]
The dynamic view of motion says it is primitive, and not reducible to objects, properties and times [Le Poidevin]
The multiverse is distinct time-series, as well as spaces [Le Poidevin]
An ordered series can be undirected, but time favours moving from earlier to later [Le Poidevin]
If time's arrow is causal, how can there be non-simultaneous events that are causally unconnected? [Le Poidevin]
Time's arrow is not causal if there is no temporal gap between cause and effect [Le Poidevin]
If time's arrow is psychological then different minds can impose different orders on events [Le Poidevin]
There are Thermodynamic, Psychological and Causal arrows of time [Le Poidevin]
Presumably if time's arrow is thermodynamic then time ends when entropy is complete [Le Poidevin]
If time is thermodynamic then entropy is necessary - but the theory says it is probable [Le Poidevin]