more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 2327

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / c. Knowledge argument ]

Full Idea

My doubts about functionalist accounts of qualia are based on the much discussed arguments from qualia inversions, and from epistemic considerations.

Clarification

'Inversions' are seeing marigold where others see violet; 'epistemic' means to do with knowledge

Gist of Idea

Knowledge and inversion make functionalism about qualia doubtful

Source

Jaegwon Kim (Mind in a Physical World [1998], §4 p.102)

Book Ref

Kim,Jaegwon: 'Mind in the Physical World' [MIT 2000], p.102


A Reaction

With a colour inversion experience changes but function doesn't. But maybe function does change if you ask the right questions. 'Is this a warm colour?' It certainly strikes me that qualia contain useful (epistemic) information.


The 22 ideas from 'Mind in a Physical World'

Protagoras says arguments on both sides are always equal [Kim, by Seneca]
Identity theory was overthrown by multiple realisations and causal anomalies [Kim]
Non-Reductive Physicalism relies on supervenience [Kim]
Supervenience is linked to dependence [Kim]
Maybe strong supervenience implies reduction [Kim]
Emergentism says there is no explanation for a supervenient property [Kim]
Maybe intentionality is reducible, but qualia aren't [Kim]
Mereological supervenience says wholes are fixed by parts [Kim]
Reductionism is good on light, genes, temperature and transparency [Kim, by PG]
Agency, knowledge, reason, memory, psychology all need mental causes [Kim, by PG]
Metaphysics is the clarification of the ontological relationships between different areas of thought [Kim]
Properties can have causal powers lacked by their constituents [Kim]
Multiple realisation applies to other species, and even one individual over time [Kim]
Emotions have both intentionality and qualia [Kim]
It seems impossible that an exact physical copy of this world could lack intentionality [Kim]
Intentionality as function seems possible [Kim]
Knowledge and inversion make functionalism about qualia doubtful [Kim]
The only mental property that might be emergent is that of qualia [Kim]
Causal power is a good way of distinguishing the real from the unreal [Kim]
Why didn't Protagoras begin by saying "a tadpole is the measure of all things"? [Plato on Kim]
Not every person is the measure of all things, but only wise people [Plato on Kim]
There are two contradictory arguments about everything [Kim]