more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23277

[filed under theme 2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 5. Objectivity ]

Full Idea

One of the pillars of the new pragmatism is the thought that the standards of objectivity come into being and evolve over time, but that being historically situated in this way does not detract from their objectivity.

Gist of Idea

Modern pragmatism sees objectivity as possible, despite its gradual evolution

Source

Cheryl Misak (Introduction to 'New Pragmatists' [2007], p.2)

Book Ref

'New Pragmatists', ed/tr. Misak,Cheryl [OUP 2009], p.2


A Reaction

This looks to me like pragmatism finally coming to its senses. I would say that being any sort of 'social construct' (beloved of cultural relativists) in no way detracts from its capacity for objectivity and truth.


The 13 ideas from Cheryl Misak

Modern pragmatism sees objectivity as possible, despite its gradual evolution [Misak]
For pragmatists the loftiest idea of truth is just a feature of what remains forever assertible [Misak]
Truth makes disagreements matter, or worth settling [Misak]
'True' is used for emphasis, clarity, assertion, comparison, objectivity, meaning, negation, consequence... [Misak]
Deflating the correspondence theory doesn't entail deflating all the other theories [Misak]
Disquotation is bivalent [Misak]
Disquotationalism resembles a telephone directory [Misak]
'That's true' doesn't just refer back to a sentence, but implies sustained evidence for it [Misak]
Truth isn't a grand elusive property, if it is just the aim of our assertions and inquiries [Misak]
Deflationism isn't a theory of truth, but an account of its role in natural language [Misak]
The anti-realism debate concerns whether indefeasibility is a plausible aim of inquiry [Misak]
Truth is proper assertion, but that has varying standards [Misak]
Disquotations says truth is assertion, and assertion proclaims truth - but what is 'assertion'? [Misak]