more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 2329

[filed under theme 7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 3. Reality ]

Full Idea

A plausible criterion for distinguishing what is real from what is not real is the possession of causal power.

Gist of Idea

Causal power is a good way of distinguishing the real from the unreal

Source

Jaegwon Kim (Mind in a Physical World [1998], §4 p.119)

Book Ref

Kim,Jaegwon: 'Mind in the Physical World' [MIT 2000], p.119

Related Idea

Idea 7022 To be is to have a capacity, to act on other things, or to receive actions [Plato]


The 22 ideas from 'Mind in a Physical World'

Protagoras says arguments on both sides are always equal [Kim, by Seneca]
Identity theory was overthrown by multiple realisations and causal anomalies [Kim]
Non-Reductive Physicalism relies on supervenience [Kim]
Supervenience is linked to dependence [Kim]
Maybe strong supervenience implies reduction [Kim]
Emergentism says there is no explanation for a supervenient property [Kim]
Maybe intentionality is reducible, but qualia aren't [Kim]
Mereological supervenience says wholes are fixed by parts [Kim]
Reductionism is good on light, genes, temperature and transparency [Kim, by PG]
Agency, knowledge, reason, memory, psychology all need mental causes [Kim, by PG]
Metaphysics is the clarification of the ontological relationships between different areas of thought [Kim]
Properties can have causal powers lacked by their constituents [Kim]
Multiple realisation applies to other species, and even one individual over time [Kim]
Emotions have both intentionality and qualia [Kim]
It seems impossible that an exact physical copy of this world could lack intentionality [Kim]
Intentionality as function seems possible [Kim]
Knowledge and inversion make functionalism about qualia doubtful [Kim]
The only mental property that might be emergent is that of qualia [Kim]
Causal power is a good way of distinguishing the real from the unreal [Kim]
Why didn't Protagoras begin by saying "a tadpole is the measure of all things"? [Plato on Kim]
Not every person is the measure of all things, but only wise people [Plato on Kim]
There are two contradictory arguments about everything [Kim]