more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23521

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 2. The Law / a. Legal system ]

Full Idea

Four questions: 1) Has the development of law been influenced by morals? 2) Must reference to morality enter into an adequate definition of law or legal system? 3) Is law open to moral criticism? 4) Does immorality justify legal punishment?

Gist of Idea

Do morals influence law? Is morality an aspect of law? Can law be morally criticised?

Source

H.L.A. Hart (Law,Liberty and Morality [1963], I 'Enforcement')

Book Ref

Hart,H.L.A.: 'Law,Liberty and Morality' [OUP 1968], p.1


A Reaction

[compressed] Three nice questions, which are his agenda for the book. It is obvious that immoral laws can be created, and that laws can be criticised for being too concerned with morality, so there is no clear general answer to these dilemmas.


The 13 ideas from H.L.A. Hart

Positive law needs secondary 'rules of recognition' for their correct application [Hart,HLA, by Zimmermann,J]
Hart (against Bentham) says human rights are what motivate legal rights [Hart,HLA, by Sen]
Hart replaced positivism with the democratic requirement of the people's acceptance [Hart,HLA, by Zimmermann,J]
The principle of legality requires crimes to be precisely defined in advance of any action [Hart,HLA]
Some private moral issues are no concern of the law [Hart,HLA]
Do morals influence law? Is morality an aspect of law? Can law be morally criticised? [Hart,HLA]
In an organised society all actions have some effect on other people [Hart,HLA]
Is the enforcement of morality morally justifiable? [Hart,HLA]
Conduct is not isolated from its effect on the moral code [Hart,HLA]
Moral wickedness of an offence is always relevant to the degree of punishment [Hart,HLA]
The value of liberty allows freedom of action, even if that distresses other people [Hart,HLA]
Modern law still suppresses practices seen as immoral, and yet harmless [Hart,HLA]
The great danger of democracy is that the oppression of the minority becomes unobjectionable [Hart,HLA]