more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Pace Parfit and others, it boggles the mind that survival could be independent of any relation of identity between the currently existing object and the objects that subsequently exist.
Gist of Idea
It seems absurd that there is no identity of any kind between two objects which involve survival
Source
Kit Fine (Vagueness: a global approach [2020], 3)
Book Ref
Fine,Kit: 'Vagueness: a global approach' [OUP 2020], p.65
A Reaction
Yes. If the self or mind just consists of a diachronic trail of memories such that the two ends of the trail have no connection at all, that isn't the kind of survival that any of us want. I want to live my life, not a life.
23539 | Classical semantics has referents for names, extensions for predicates, and T or F for sentences [Fine,K] |
23541 | Supervaluation can give no answer to 'who is the last bald man' [Fine,K] |
23544 | Local indeterminacy concerns a single object, and global indeterminacy covers a range [Fine,K] |
23540 | Conjoining two indefinites by related sentences seems to produce a contradiction [Fine,K] |
23542 | Identifying vagueness with ignorance is the common mistake of confusing symptoms with cause [Fine,K] |
23543 | We identify laws with regularities because we mistakenly identify causes with their symptoms [Fine,K] |
23545 | We do not have an intelligible concept of a borderline case [Fine,K] |
23546 | Standardly vagueness involves borderline cases, and a higher standpoint from which they can be seen [Fine,K] |
23548 | Indeterminacy is in conflict with classical logic [Fine,K] |
23547 | It seems absurd that there is no identity of any kind between two objects which involve survival [Fine,K] |