more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23622

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / a. For mathematical platonism ]

Full Idea

Numbers cannot be mental objects constructed by our own minds: there exists at most a potential infinity of mental constructions, whereas the axioms of mathematics require an actual infinity of numbers.

Gist of Idea

We can only mentally construct potential infinities, but maths needs actual infinities

Source

Keith Hossack (Knowledge and the Philosophy of Number [2020], Intro 2)

Book Ref

Hossack, Keith: 'Knowledge and the Philosophy of Number' [Routledge 2021], p.3


A Reaction

Doubt this, but don't know enough to refute it. Actual infinities were a fairly late addition to maths, I think. I would think treating fictional complete infinities as real would be sufficient for the job. Like journeys which include imagined roads.

Related Idea

Idea 23626 Transfinite ordinals are needed in proof theory, and for recursive functions and computability [Hossack]


The 29 ideas from Keith Hossack

Numbers are properties, not sets (because numbers are magnitudes) [Hossack]
We can only mentally construct potential infinities, but maths needs actual infinities [Hossack]
Predicativism says only predicated sets exist [Hossack]
The iterative conception has to appropriate Replacement, to justify the ordinals [Hossack]
Limitation of Size justifies Replacement, but then has to appropriate Power Set [Hossack]
Transfinite ordinals are needed in proof theory, and for recursive functions and computability [Hossack]
'Before' and 'after' are not two relations, but one relation with two orders [Hossack]
The connective 'and' can have an order-sensitive meaning, as 'and then' [Hossack]
A thought can refer to many things, but only predicate a universal and affirm a state of affairs [Hossack]
Complex particulars are either masses, or composites, or sets [Hossack]
Leibniz's Law argues against atomism - water is wet, unlike water molecules [Hossack]
Plural reference will refer to complex facts without postulating complex things [Hossack]
Plural reference is just an abbreviation when properties are distributive, but not otherwise [Hossack]
We are committed to a 'group' of children, if they are sitting in a circle [Hossack]
Plural definite descriptions pick out the largest class of things that fit the description [Hossack]
A plural comprehension principle says there are some things one of which meets some condition [Hossack]
Plural language can discuss without inconsistency things that are not members of themselves [Hossack]
A plural language gives a single comprehensive induction axiom for arithmetic [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice is a non-logical principle of set-theory [Hossack]
Extensional mereology needs two definitions and two axioms [Hossack]
The relation of composition is indispensable to the part-whole relation for individuals [Hossack]
The fusion of five rectangles can decompose into more than five parts that are rectangles [Hossack]
In arithmetic singularists need sets as the instantiator of numeric properties [Hossack]
The theory of the transfinite needs the ordinal numbers [Hossack]
I take the real numbers to be just lengths [Hossack]
We could ignore space, and just talk of the shape of matter [Hossack]
Set theory is the science of infinity [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice guarantees a one-one correspondence from sets to ordinals [Hossack]
Maybe we reduce sets to ordinals, rather than the other way round [Hossack]