more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 23653

[filed under theme 18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 2. Abstracta by Selection ]

Full Idea

If you perceive an object, white, round, and a foot in diameter, if you had not been able to distinguish the colour from the figure, and both from the magnitude, your senses would only give you one complex and confused notion of all these mingled together

Gist of Idea

If you can't distinguish the features of a complex object, your notion of it would be a muddle

Source

Thomas Reid (Essays on Intellectual Powers 6: Judgement [1785], 1)

Book Ref

Reid,Thomas: 'Inquiry and Essays', ed/tr. Beanblossom /K.Lehrer [Hackett 1983], p.257


A Reaction

His point is that if you reject the 'abstraction' of these qualities, you still cannot deny that distinguishing them is an essential aspect of perceiving complex things. Does this mean that animals distinguish such things?


The 11 ideas from 'Essays on Intellectual Powers 6: Judgement'

If you can't distinguish the features of a complex object, your notion of it would be a muddle [Reid]
An ad hominem argument is good, if it is shown that the man's principles are inconsistent [Reid]
In obscure matters the few must lead the many, but the many usually lead in common sense [Reid]
The structure of languages reveals a uniformity in basic human opinions [Reid]
The existence of tensed verbs shows that not all truths are necessary truths [Reid]
The theory of ideas, popular with philosophers, means past existence has to be proved [Reid]
Consciousness is an indefinable and unique operation [Reid]
If someone denies that he is thinking when he is conscious of it, we can only laugh [Reid]
The existence of ideas is no more obvious than the existence of external objects [Reid]
We are only aware of other beings through our senses; without that, we are alone in the universe [Reid]
There are axioms of taste - such as a general consensus about a beautiful face [Reid]