more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23696

[filed under theme 2. Reason / E. Argument / 2. Transcendental Argument ]

Full Idea

Not every a priori cognition must be called transcendental, but only that by means of which we cognize that, and how certain representations (intuitions or concepts) are applied entirely a priori, or are possible.

Gist of Idea

Transcendental cognition is that a priori thought which shows how the a priori is applicable or possible

Source

Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B80/A56)

Book Ref

Kant,Immanuel: 'Critique of Pure Reason', ed/tr. Guyer,P /Wood,A W [CUO 1998], p.196


A Reaction

Kant really wasn't good at expressing himself. I would describe this as either explanation, or as meta-thought.

Related Idea

Idea 624 Absolute thinking is the thinking of thinking [Aristotle]


The 5 ideas with the same theme [backwards reasoning to accepting presuppositions]:

'Transcendent' is beyond experience, and 'transcendental' is concealed within experience [Kant, by Potter]
Transcendental ideas require unity of the subject, conditions of appearance, and objects of thought [Kant]
Transcendental cognition is that a priori thought which shows how the a priori is applicable or possible [Kant]
Transcendental arguments move from knowing Q to knowing P because it depends on Q [Fodor]
Transcendental proofs derive necessities from possibilities (e.g. possibility of experiencing objects) [Gardner]