more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23745

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 3. Acting on Reason / a. Practical reason ]

Full Idea

We cannot expect that, even under conditions of full rationality, agents would all converge on the same desires about what is to be done in the various circumstances they might face.

Gist of Idea

We cannot expect even fully rational people to converge on having the same desires for action

Source

Michael Smith (The Moral Problem [1994], 5.9)

Book Ref

Smith,Michael: 'The Moral Problem' [Blackwell 1994], p.165


A Reaction

A very good argument in favour of the Humean view that desires are an essential part of moral motivation. Possible convergence of view is a standard hallmark of communal rationality.

Related Idea

Idea 17213 In so far as men live according to reason, they will agree with one another [Spinoza]


The 20 ideas from Michael Smith

Analysis aims to express the full set of platitudes surrounding a given concept [Smith,M]
In the Humean account, desires are not true/false, or subject to any rational criticism [Smith,M]
A pure desire could be criticised if it were based on a false belief [Smith,M]
Expressivists count attitudes as 'moral' if they concern features of things, rather than their mere existence [Smith,M]
Moral internalism says a judgement of rightness is thereby motivating [Smith,M]
'Rationalism' says the rightness of an action is a reason to perform it [Smith,M]
'Externalists' say moral judgements are not reasons, and maybe not even motives [Smith,M]
A person could make a moral judgement without being in any way motivated by it [Smith,M]
Motivating reasons are psychological, while normative reasons are external [Smith,M]
A person can have a desire without feeling it [Smith,M]
Subjects may be fallible about the desires which explain their actions [Smith,M]
Humeans (unlike their opponents) say that desires and judgements can separate [Smith,M]
Goals need desires, and so only desires can motivate us [Smith,M]
Humeans take maximising desire satisfaction as the normative reasons for actions [Smith,M]
Is valuing something a matter of believing or a matter of desiring? [Smith,M]
If first- and second-order desires conflict, harmony does not require the second-order to win [Smith,M]
Objective reasons to act might be the systematic desires of a fully rational person [Smith,M]
Defining a set of things by paradigms doesn't pin them down enough [Smith,M]
Capturing all the common sense facts about rationality is almost impossible [Smith,M]
We cannot expect even fully rational people to converge on having the same desires for action [Smith,M]