more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23776

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 5. Powers and Properties ]

Full Idea

Power Monism: all properties are powers. Categoricalism: all fundamentals are categorical. Dualism allows both types. I defend Mixed Monism - that there is a single class of fundamental properties that are at once powerful and categorical.

Gist of Idea

Rather than pure powers or pure categoricals, I favour basics which are both at once

Source

Neil E. Williams (The Powers Metaphysics [2019], 03.3)

Book Ref

Williams,Neil E.: 'The Powers Metaphysics' [OUP 2019], p.56


A Reaction

This is the main dilemma for the powers ontology - of how powers can be basic, if there needs to be some entity which possesses the power. But what possesses the powers of an electron? I like Williams's idea, without being clear about it.


The 23 ideas from Neil E. Williams

A metaphysic is a set of wider explanations derived from a basic ontology [Williams,NE]
Reductive analysis makes a concept clearer, by giving an alternative simpler set [Williams,NE]
Promoting an ontology by its implied good metaphysic is an 'argument-by-display' [Williams,NE]
Fundamental physics describes everything in terms of powers [Williams,NE]
If objects are property bundles, the properties need combining powers [Williams,NE]
Humeans say properties are passive, possibility is vast, laws are descriptions, causation is weak [Williams,NE]
Powers are 'multi-track' if they can produce a variety of manifestations [Williams,NE]
There are basic powers, which underlie dispositions, potentialities, capacities etc [Williams,NE]
Rather than pure powers or pure categoricals, I favour basics which are both at once [Williams,NE]
Powers are more complicated than properties which are always on display [Williams,NE]
Powers contain lawlike features, pointing to possible future states [Williams,NE]
We shouldn't posit the existence of anything we have a word for [Williams,NE]
Every possible state of affairs is written into its originating powers [Williams,NE]
Change exists, it is causal, and it needs an explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation is the exercise of powers [Williams,NE]
Processes don't begin or end; they just change direction unexpectedly [Williams,NE]
The status quo is part of what exists, and so needs metaphysical explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation needs to explain stasis, as well as change [Williams,NE]
If causes and effects overlap, that makes changes impossible [Williams,NE]
Four-Dimensional is Perdurantism (temporal parts), plus Eternalism [Williams,NE]
Naming powers is unwise, because that it usually done by a single manifestation [Williams,NE]
Processes are either strings of short unchanging states, or continuous and unreducible events [Williams,NE]
Dispositions are just useful descriptions, which are explained by underlying powers [Williams,NE]