more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23778

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / c. Essence and laws ]

Full Idea

Powers carry their lawlike features within them: it is part of their essence, qua power. Their pointing at future states just is their internal law-like nature; it is what gets expressed in such and such conditions.

Gist of Idea

Powers contain lawlike features, pointing to possible future states

Source

Neil E. Williams (The Powers Metaphysics [2019], 03.3)

Book Ref

Williams,Neil E.: 'The Powers Metaphysics' [OUP 2019], p.64


A Reaction

Modern writers on powers seem unaware that Leibniz got there first. This seems to me the correct account of the ontology of laws. The formulation of laws is probably the best descriptive system for nature's patterns (over time as well as space).

Related Idea

Idea 16507 The law within something fixes its persistence, and accords with general laws of nature [Leibniz]


The 23 ideas from Neil E. Williams

A metaphysic is a set of wider explanations derived from a basic ontology [Williams,NE]
Reductive analysis makes a concept clearer, by giving an alternative simpler set [Williams,NE]
Promoting an ontology by its implied good metaphysic is an 'argument-by-display' [Williams,NE]
Fundamental physics describes everything in terms of powers [Williams,NE]
If objects are property bundles, the properties need combining powers [Williams,NE]
Humeans say properties are passive, possibility is vast, laws are descriptions, causation is weak [Williams,NE]
Powers are 'multi-track' if they can produce a variety of manifestations [Williams,NE]
There are basic powers, which underlie dispositions, potentialities, capacities etc [Williams,NE]
Rather than pure powers or pure categoricals, I favour basics which are both at once [Williams,NE]
Powers are more complicated than properties which are always on display [Williams,NE]
Powers contain lawlike features, pointing to possible future states [Williams,NE]
We shouldn't posit the existence of anything we have a word for [Williams,NE]
Every possible state of affairs is written into its originating powers [Williams,NE]
Change exists, it is causal, and it needs an explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation is the exercise of powers [Williams,NE]
Processes don't begin or end; they just change direction unexpectedly [Williams,NE]
The status quo is part of what exists, and so needs metaphysical explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation needs to explain stasis, as well as change [Williams,NE]
If causes and effects overlap, that makes changes impossible [Williams,NE]
Four-Dimensional is Perdurantism (temporal parts), plus Eternalism [Williams,NE]
Naming powers is unwise, because that it usually done by a single manifestation [Williams,NE]
Processes are either strings of short unchanging states, or continuous and unreducible events [Williams,NE]
Dispositions are just useful descriptions, which are explained by underlying powers [Williams,NE]