more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 23789

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 1. Powers ]

Full Idea

Naming powers is unwise; the main reason is that there is a long tradition of naming powers according to the manifestations they can produce, and that does not square well with multi-track powers.

Clarification

A 'multi-track' power can produce diverse results

Gist of Idea

Naming powers is unwise, because that it usually done by a single manifestation

Source

Neil E. Williams (The Powers Metaphysics [2019], 08.4)

Book Ref

Williams,Neil E.: 'The Powers Metaphysics' [OUP 2019], p.191


A Reaction

On the other hand there must be some attempt to individuate powers (by scientists, if not by philosophers), and that can only rely on the manifestations. Describe them, rather than name them? Just assign them a number!


The 23 ideas from 'The Powers Metaphysics'

A metaphysic is a set of wider explanations derived from a basic ontology [Williams,NE]
Reductive analysis makes a concept clearer, by giving an alternative simpler set [Williams,NE]
Promoting an ontology by its implied good metaphysic is an 'argument-by-display' [Williams,NE]
Fundamental physics describes everything in terms of powers [Williams,NE]
If objects are property bundles, the properties need combining powers [Williams,NE]
Humeans say properties are passive, possibility is vast, laws are descriptions, causation is weak [Williams,NE]
Powers are 'multi-track' if they can produce a variety of manifestations [Williams,NE]
There are basic powers, which underlie dispositions, potentialities, capacities etc [Williams,NE]
Rather than pure powers or pure categoricals, I favour basics which are both at once [Williams,NE]
Powers are more complicated than properties which are always on display [Williams,NE]
Powers contain lawlike features, pointing to possible future states [Williams,NE]
We shouldn't posit the existence of anything we have a word for [Williams,NE]
Every possible state of affairs is written into its originating powers [Williams,NE]
Change exists, it is causal, and it needs an explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation is the exercise of powers [Williams,NE]
Processes don't begin or end; they just change direction unexpectedly [Williams,NE]
The status quo is part of what exists, and so needs metaphysical explanation [Williams,NE]
Causation needs to explain stasis, as well as change [Williams,NE]
If causes and effects overlap, that makes changes impossible [Williams,NE]
Four-Dimensional is Perdurantism (temporal parts), plus Eternalism [Williams,NE]
Naming powers is unwise, because that it usually done by a single manifestation [Williams,NE]
Processes are either strings of short unchanging states, or continuous and unreducible events [Williams,NE]
Dispositions are just useful descriptions, which are explained by underlying powers [Williams,NE]