more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23827

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / a. Just wars ]

Full Idea

For our contemporaries the role of Helen in the Trojan War is is played by words with capital letters. …When empty words are given capital letters, then, on the slightest pretext, men will begin shedding blood for them and piling up ruin in their name.

Gist of Idea

Modern wars are fought in the name of empty words which are given capital letters

Source

Simone Weil (The Power of Words [1934], p.241)

Book Ref

Weil,Simone: 'An Anthology' [Penguin 1986], p.241


A Reaction

This seems particularly true of the 1930s, where specific dogmatic ideologies seemed to grip and divide people. Simple aggressive nationalism seems to be the cause of current wars, now the fear of Communism has diminished.

Related Idea

Idea 23830 A group is only dangerous if it endorses an abstract entity [Weil]


The 30 ideas with the same theme [justifications for starting a war]:

There is no greater good for a warrior than to fight in a just war [Anon (Bhag)]
For Aquinas a war must be in a just cause, have proper authority, and aim at good [Aquinas, by Grayling]
A desire to conquer, and men who do it, are always praised, or not blamed [Machiavelli]
Only Utopians fail to see glory in warfare [More,T]
The only just cause for a war is a wrong received [Vitoria]
Leaders can only attack foreigners who have done wrong (as with their own subjects) [Vitoria]
The people (who have to fight) and not the head of state should declare a war [Kant]
Wars add strength to a nation, and cure internal dissension [Hegel]
Modern wars arise from the study of history [Nietzsche]
People will enthusiastically pursue an unwanted war, once sacrifices have been made [Nietzsche]
To renounce war is to renounce the grand life [Nietzsche]
Modern wars are fought in the name of empty words which are given capital letters [Weil]
The State requires self-preservation, but the war-machine desires destruction [Deleuze]
Even non-violent intrusive acts between states count as aggression, if they justify resistance [Walzer]
The only good reason for fighting is in defence of rights [Walzer]
States can rightly pre-empt real and serious threats [Walzer]
Just wars are self-defence, or a rightful intercession in another's troubles [Walzer]
The aim of reprisals is to enforce the rules of war [Walzer]
Reprisal is defensible, as an alternative to war [Walzer]
States need not endure attacks passively, and successful reprisals are legitimate [Walzer]
With nuclear weapons we have a permanent supreme emergency (which is unstable) [Walzer]
Nuclear bombs are not for normal war; they undermine the 'just war', with a new morality [Walzer]
War must also have a good chance of success, and be waged with moderation [Grayling]
The worst unjustified wars have no aim at all [McMahan]
Wars can be unjust, despite a just cause, if they are unnecessary or excessive or of mixed cause [McMahan]
You (e.g. a police officer) are not liable to attack just because you pose a threat [McMahan]
Just war theory says all and only persons posing a threat are liable to attack [McMahan]
A defensive war is unjust, if it is responding to a just war [McMahan]
A person or state may be attacked if they are responsible for an unjustified threat [McMahan]
Just wars: resist aggression, done on just cause, proportionate, last resort, not futile, legal [Tuckness/Wolf]