more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23870

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 2. Anarchism ]

Full Idea

The only possibility of salvation would lie in a co-operation between weak and strong, with a view to accomplishing a progressive decentralisation of social life; but the absurdity of such an idea strikes one immediately.

Gist of Idea

Decentralisation is only possible by co-operation between strong and weak - which is absurd

Source

Simone Weil (Reflections on Liberty and Social Oppression [1934], p.113)

Book Ref

Weil,Simone: 'Oppression and Liberty' [Routledge 1955], p.113


A Reaction

I take this to be a judgement on the anarchist ideal, rather than a bit of modest devolution. The UK government set up regional parliaments. She says centralisation is remorseless.


The 14 ideas with the same theme [self-rule by citizens, and abolition of government]:

Nothing is worse for mankind than anarchy [Antiphon]
Diogenes masturbated in public, wishing he could get rid of hunger so easily [Diogenes of Sin., by Plutarch]
In an anarchy universities, research, books, and even seaside holidays, would be impossible [Russell]
A state is essential, to control greedy or predatory impulses [Russell]
Anarchy does not maximise liberty [Russell]
Our only social duty is to try to limit evil [Weil]
Decentralisation is only possible by co-operation between strong and weak - which is absurd [Weil]
Individual rights are so strong that the state and its officials must be very limited in power [Nozick]
The state, law, bureaucracy and capital are limitations on life, so I prefer federalist anarchism [Critchley]
Anarchism used to be libertarian (especially for sexuality), but now concerns responsibility [Critchley]
A realistic and less utopian anarchism looks increasingly like liberal democracy [Wolff,J]
It is hard for anarchists to deny that we need experts [Wolff,J]
Anarchists prefer local and communal government [Oksala]
Why do anarchists drink herbal tea? [Sommers,W]