more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23887

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / B. Nature of Art / 1. Defining Art ]

Full Idea

Isn't true art a method for establishing a certain relation between the world and the self, and between oneself and others, and isn't that the equivalent of philosophy?

Gist of Idea

Art (like philosophy) establishes a relation between world and self, and between oneself and others

Source

Simone Weil (Philosophy [1941], p.38)

Book Ref

Weil,Simone: 'Late Philosophical Writings' [Notre Dame 2015], p.38


A Reaction

I hope the definition of 'true' art doesn't have to conform to achieving this relation. I suppose each good work of art shows you a distinctive way of relating to the world. An interesting thought (as so often with this thinker).


The 10 ideas with the same theme [possibility of a general definition of art]:

Aestheticism invites artist to create beauty, but with no indication of how to do it [Bell,C]
Art is the expression of an emotion for ultimate reality [Bell,C]
Art (like philosophy) establishes a relation between world and self, and between oneself and others [Weil]
Art is a referential activity, hence indefinable, but it has a set of symptoms [Goodman]
We should first decide what are the great works of art, with aesthetic theory following from that [Murdoch]
A criterion of identity for works of art would be easier than a definition [Wollheim]
Early 20th cent attempts at defining art focused on significant form, intuition, expression, unity [Lamarque/Olson]
The idea that art forms are linked into a single concept began in the 1740s [Davies,S]
Defining art as representation or expression or form were all undermined by the avant-garde [Davies,S]
'Aesthetic functionalism' says art is what is intended to create aesthetic experiences [Davies,S]