more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23917

[filed under theme 2. Reason / B. Laws of Thought / 3. Non-Contradiction ]

Full Idea

Contrary things can be reasonably held …because the contrary positions will stand if what is said is true in one way, but not true in another.

Gist of Idea

Contrary statements can both be reasonable, if they are meant in two different ways

Source

Aristotle (Eudemian Ethics [c.333 BCE], 1235b17)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Eudemian Ethics', ed/tr. Reeve, C.D.C. [Hackett 2021], p.113


A Reaction

My strategy here is to clarify the unambiguous underlying propositions which are being expressed. There will then be either agreement, or flat contradiction.


The 22 ideas with the same theme [a proposition is claimed to be both true and false]:

Contradiction is impossible [Antisthenes (I), by Aristotle]
Contrary statements can both be reasonable, if they are meant in two different ways [Aristotle]
A thing cannot be both in and not-in the same thing (at a given time) [Aristotle]
We cannot say that one thing both is and is not a man [Aristotle]
For Aristotle predication is regulated by Non-Contradiction, because underlying stability is essential [Roochnik on Aristotle]
The most certain basic principle is that contradictories can't be true at the same time [Aristotle]
Aristotle does not take the principle of non-contradiction for granted [Aristotle, by Politis]
From an impossibility anything follows [William of Ockham]
If truth is just non-contradiction, we must take care that our basic concepts aren't contradictory [Hegel]
Being and nothing are the same and not the same, which is the identity of identity and non-identity [Hegel]
The so-called world is filled with contradiction [Hegel]
Self-contradiction doesn't reveal impossibility; it is inductive impossibility which reveals self-contradiction [Peirce]
Our inability to both affirm and deny a single thing is merely an inability, not a 'necessity' [Nietzsche]
Man has an intense natural interest in the consistency of his own thinking [James]
Non-contradiction was learned from instances, and then found to be indubitable [Russell]
The problem is to explain the role of contradiction in social life [Wittgenstein]
If you say that a contradiction is true, you change the meaning of 'not', and so change the subject [Quine]
To affirm 'p and not-p' is to have mislearned 'and' or 'not' [Quine]
Someone standing in a doorway seems to be both in and not-in the room [Priest,G, by Sorensen]
You cannot rationally deny the principle of non-contradiction, because all reasoning requires it [Baggini /Fosl]
The law of noncontradiction makes the distinction between asserting something and denying it [Fogelin]
Non-contradiction is unjustified, so it only reveals a fact about thinking, not about reality? [Meillassoux]