more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 23937

[filed under theme 18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 3. Emotions / f. Emotion and reason ]

Full Idea

It is not the passions who require the controls and rationalisations of reason. Rather, it is reason that requires the anchorage and earthy wisdom of the passions.

Gist of Idea

It is reason which needs the anchorage of passions, rather than vice versa

Source

Robert C. Solomon (The Passions [1976], Pref)

Book Ref

Solomon,Robert C.: 'The Passions (1993 ed)' [Hackett 1993], p.-8


A Reaction

I like the second half of this. We don't just follow the winds of arguments; we decide into which of the many conflicting winds we should steer the rational arguments, and that needs passions. Only a fool doesn't rationally control their passions.

Related Idea

Idea 23767 The winds of the discussion should decide its destination [Plato]


The 11 ideas with the same theme [relationship between emotions and reason]:

Some say emotion is a sort of reason, and others say virtue concerns emotion [Plutarch]
Minds are subject to passions if they have inadequate ideas [Spinoza]
An emotion is only bad if it hinders us from thinking [Spinoza]
Every feeling is the perception of a truth [Leibniz]
We fail to see that reason is a network of passions, and every passion contains some reason [Nietzsche]
It is reason which needs the anchorage of passions, rather than vice versa [Solomon]
Dividing ourselves into confrontational reason and passion destroys our harmonious whole [Solomon]
The supposed irrationality of our emotions is often tactless or faulty expression of them [Solomon]
Emotions are usually very apt, rather than being non-rational and fickle [Flanagan]
Some emotions are direct responses, and neither rational nor irrational [Goldie]
Emotional thought is not rational, but it can be intelligible [Goldie]