more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 24002

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 2. Elements of Virtue Theory / e. Character ]

Full Idea

We significantly overestimate the role of character traits in explaining and predicting people's action: the so-called Fundamental Attribution error.

Gist of Idea

We over-estimate the role of character traits when explaining behaviour

Source

Peter Goldie (The Emotions [2000], 6 'Traits')

Book Ref

Goldie,Peter: 'The Emotions' [OUP 2002], p.152


A Reaction

I think this point is incredibly important in daily life. 'When someone shows you who they are, believe them!' is a good thought. But we must distinguish the deeply revealing moment from the transient superficial one.

Related Idea

Idea 15701 Nouns seem to invoke stable kinds more than predicates do [Gelman]


The 34 ideas from Peter Goldie

The personal view can still be objective, so I call sciences 'impersonal', rather than objective [Goldie]
Some emotions are direct responses, and neither rational nor irrational [Goldie]
If reasons are seen impersonally (as just causal), then feelings are an irrelevant extra [Goldie]
We have feelings of which we are hardly aware towards things in the world [Goldie]
Emotions are not avocado pears, with a rigid core and changeable surface [Goldie]
Emotional thought is not rational, but it can be intelligible [Goldie]
'Having an emotion' differs from 'being emotional' [Goldie]
Emotional responses can reveal to us our values, which might otherwise remain hidden [Goldie]
If we have a 'feeling towards' an object, that gives the recognition a different content [Goldie]
Learning an evaluative property like 'dangerous' is also learning an emotion [Goldie]
When actions are performed 'out of' emotion, they appear to be quite different [Goldie]
Unlike moods, emotions have specific objects, though the difference is a matter of degree [Goldie]
Emotional intentionality as belief and desire misses out the necessity of feelings [Goldie]
A long lasting and evolving emotion is still seen as a single emotion, such as love [Goldie]
It is best to see emotions holistically, as embedded in a person's life narrative [Goldie]
If emotions are 'towards' things, they can't be bodily feelings, which lack aboutness [Goldie]
We call emotions 'passions' because they are not as controlled as we would like [Goldie]
An emotion needs episodes of feeling, but not continuously [Goldie]
Emotional control is hard, but we are responsible for our emotions over long time periods [Goldie]
Emotions are not easily changed, as new knowledge makes little difference, and akrasia is possible [Goldie]
Emotional control is less concerned with emotional incidents, and more with emotional tendencies [Goldie]
Akrasia can be either overruling our deliberation, or failing to deliberate [Goldie]
Our capabilities did not all evolve during the hunter gathering period [Goldie]
A basic emotion is the foundation of a hierarchy, such as anger for types of annoyance [Goldie]
Early Chinese basic emotions: joy, anger, sadness, fear, love, disliking, and liking [Goldie]
Some Aborigines have fifteen different words for types of fear [Goldie]
Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions suggests seven basic emotions [Goldie]
Justifying reasons say you were right; excusing reasons say your act was explicable [Goldie]
Moods can focus as emotions, and emotions can blur into moods [Goldie]
Character traits are both possession of and lack of dispositions [Goldie]
We over-estimate the role of character traits when explaining behaviour [Goldie]
Psychologists suggest we are muddled about traits, and maybe they should be abandoned [Goldie]
We know other's emotions by explanation, contagion, empathy, imagination, or sympathy [Goldie]
Empathy and imagining don't ensure sympathy, and sympathy doesn't need them [Goldie]