more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 24025

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 2. Self-Evidence ]

Full Idea

We require two conditions for intuition, namely that the proposition appear clear and distinct, and then that it be understood all at once and not successively. Deduction, on the other hand, implies a certain movement of the mind.

Gist of Idea

Clear and distinct truths must be known all at once (unlike deductions)

Source

René Descartes (Rules for the Direction of the Mind [1628], 11)

Book Ref

Descartes,René: 'Rules for the Direction of the Mind' [Newcomb Library 2023], p.32


A Reaction

A nice distinction. Presumably with deduction you grasp each step clearly, and then the inference and conclusion, and you can then forget the previous steps because you have something secure.


The 23 ideas with the same theme [knowledge that is immediately grasped or obvious]:

Start a thesis with something undisputable [Diogenes of Apollonia]
Self-evidence is most obvious when people who deny a proposition still have to use it [Epictetus]
Some things are self-evident to us; others are only self-evident in themselves [Aquinas]
Augustine's 'illumination' theory of knowledge leads to nothing but scepticism [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
Clear and distinct truths must be known all at once (unlike deductions) [Descartes]
Descartes needs to demonstrate how other people can attain his clear and distinct conceptions [Leibniz]
Truths are self-evident to sensible persons who understand them clearly without prejudice [Reid]
Experienceless bodies have space; propertyless bodies have substance; this must be seen a priori [Kant]
Mathematicians just accept self-evidence, whether it is logical or intuitive [Frege]
Frege's concept of 'self-evident' makes no reference to minds [Frege, by Burge]
Feelings of self-evidence (and necessity) are just the inventions of theory [Husserl]
Husserl says we have intellectual intuitions (of categories), as well as of the senses [Husserl, by Velarde-Mayol]
Self-evidence is often a mere will-o'-the-wisp [Russell]
Some propositions are self-evident, but their implications may also be self-evident [Russell]
Particular instances are more clearly self-evident than any general principles [Russell]
As shown by memory, self-evidence comes in degrees [Russell]
If self-evidence has degrees, we should accept the more self-evident as correct [Russell]
If the truth doesn't follow from self-evidence, then self-evidence cannot justify a truth [Wittgenstein]
A sentence is obvious if it is true, and any speaker of the language will instantly agree to it [Quine]
It is hard to give the concept of 'self-evident' a clear and defensible characterization [Bonjour]
Fregean self-evidence is an intrinsic property of basic truths, rules and definitions [Hart,WD]
Two propositions might seem self-evident, but contradict one another [Grayling]
There are 'armchair' truths which are not a priori, because experience was involved [Williamson]