more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 24117

[filed under theme 20. Action / B. Preliminaries of Action / 2. Willed Action / d. Weakness of will ]

Full Idea

All lower drives must be present and have fresh force if the highest ones want to exist and exist in abundance: but control of the whole must be in firm hands! otherwise the danger is too great.

Gist of Idea

We need lower and higher drives, but they must be under firm control

Source

Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1881-82 [1882], 14[03])

Book Ref

Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'The Joyful Science, and 1881-82 fragments (v 6)', ed/tr. Del Caro,Adrian [Stanford 2023], p.429


A Reaction

This is unusual, because he speaks of the Self as little more than the currently dominant drive, but here he postulates a controller of the drives, a ringmaster. A-krasia means lack of control. Nietzsche wants en-krateia.

Related Idea

Idea 24107 Once a drive controls the intellect, it rules, and sets the goals [Nietzsche]


The 30 ideas with the same theme [failing to perform the action which is judged best]:

Some reasonings are stronger than we are [Philolaus]
The common belief is that people can know the best without acting on it [Socrates]
No one willingly commits an evil or base act [Socrates]
Socrates did not accept the tripartite soul (which permits akrasia) [Vlastos on Socrates]
People do what they think they should do, and only ever do what they think they should do [Socrates, by Xenophon]
Socrates was shocked by the idea of akrasia, but observation shows that it happens [Aristotle on Socrates]
Self-controlled follow understanding, when it is opposed to desires [Aristotle]
Aristotle seems not to explain why the better syllogism is overcome in akratic actions [Burnyeat on Aristotle]
The akrates acts from desire not choice, and the enkrates acts from choice not desire [Aristotle]
Virtue is right reason and feeling and action. Akrasia and enkrateia are lower levels of action. [Aristotle, by Cottingham]
Akrasia merely neglects or misunderstands knowledge, rather than opposing it [Achtenberg on Aristotle]
Some people explain akrasia by saying only opinion is present, not knowledge [Aristotle]
A person may act against one part of his knowledge, if he knows both universal and particular [Aristotle]
Aristotle sees akrasia as acting against what is chosen, not against reason [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Akrasia is explained by past mental failures, not by a specific choice [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Licentious people feel no regret, but weak-willed people are capable of repentance [Aristotle]
Akrasia is the clash of two feelings - goodness and pleasure [Aristotle]
A community can lack self-control [Aristotle]
Passions are judgements; greed thinks money is honorable, and likewise drinking and lust [Chrysippus, by Diog. Laertius]
Limited awareness leads to bad choices, and unconscious awareness makes us choose the bad [Leibniz, by Perkins]
Socrates neglects the gap between knowing what is good and doing good [Kierkegaard, by Carlisle]
We need lower and higher drives, but they must be under firm control [Nietzsche]
There is no will; weakness of will is splitting of impulses, strong will is coordination under one impulse [Nietzsche]
Weakness of will is the inadequacy of the original impetus to carry through the action [Weil]
The causally strongest reason may not be the reason the actor judges to be best [Davidson]
We judge weakness of will by an assessment after the event is concluded [Williams,B, by Cottingham]
Akrasia is intelligible in hindsight, when we revisit our previous emotions [Blackburn]
There may be inverse akrasia, where the agent's action is better than their judgement recommends [Hursthouse]
Akrasia can be either overruling our deliberation, or failing to deliberate [Goldie]
If you can judge one act as best, then do another, this supports an inward-looking view of agency [Stout,R]