more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
What we believe the most, everything a priori, is not for that reason more certain, just because it is so strongly believed. Rather, it is perhaps a consequence of the condition for the existence of our species.
Gist of Idea
Strongly believed a priori is not certain; it may just be a feature of our existence
Source
Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1884-85 [1884], 25[307])
Book Ref
Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'Fragments from 1884-85 (v 15)', ed/tr. Loeb,P.S./Tinsley,D.F. [Stanford 2022], p.78
A Reaction
This is in defiance of Leibniz and Kant. His proposed explanation is not very convincing. Russell agreed with Nietzsche.
| 24138 | Strongly believed a priori is not certain; it may just be a feature of our existence [Nietzsche] |
| 23485 | No pictures are true a priori [Wittgenstein] |
| 9338 | Quine's objections to a priori knowledge only work in the domain of science [Horwich on Quine] |
| 9337 | Science is empirical, simple and conservative; any belief can hence be abandoned; so no a priori [Quine, by Horwich] |
| 9340 | Logic, arithmetic and geometry are revisable and a posteriori; quantum logic could be right [Horwich on Quine] |
| 20961 | What is considered a priori changes as language changes [Habermas, by Bowie] |
| 18272 | Platonism defines the a priori in a way that makes it unknowable [Coffa] |
| 9356 | The idea of the a priori is so obscure that it won't explain anything [Devitt] |
| 19564 | Some knowledge must be empirical; naturalism implies that all knowledge is like that [Devitt] |
| 13476 | The failure of key assumptions in geometry, mereology and set theory throw doubt on the a priori [Hart,WD] |
| 9384 | We may have strong a priori beliefs which we pragmatically drop from our best theory [Boghossian] |