more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 24165

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 3. Pleasure / c. Value of pleasure ]

Full Idea

It is a mistake to think pleasure is the only thing that is valuable for its own sake. It confuses final value with the intrinsic value of pleasure. (note: Intrinsic value is apart from any relationships or contexts).

Gist of Idea

Pleasure has an intrinsic (independent) value, but that is not a final (for its own sake) value

Source

Tom Cochrane (The Aesthetic Value of the World [2021], 0.2)

Book Ref

Cochrane,Tom: 'The Aesthetic Value of the World' [OUP 2021], p.2


A Reaction

Cochrane says the value of most pleasure is extrinsic (i.e. valued because of its connection to something else). Cochrane is defending aesthetic appreciation as a final value. Not sure his distinction is clear enough. But interesting. Hedonists disagree.


The 11 ideas from 'The Aesthetic Value of the World'

Even non-theists can wonder what, if anything, makes the universe good [Cochrane]
Pleasure has an intrinsic (independent) value, but that is not a final (for its own sake) value [Cochrane]
Pleasure serves to maintain our relationship with its source [Cochrane]
Love is a mutual reciprocation, not just a desire for something [Cochrane]
We can treat value as a verb; we value something when we positively engage with it [Cochrane]
Aesthetic value appreciates a thing objectively, as a good in its own right [Cochrane]
Morality is not a final value; it concerns how we distribute the things we actually finally value [Cochrane]
We can only understand form if we grasp the whole of which things are parts [Cochrane]
Beauty is fittingness, of details uniting within a pattern [Cochrane]
Accounts of sublimity differ over whether we learn something good about ourselves [Cochrane]
A person's activities have value when they receive full attention [Cochrane]