more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 2445

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / A. Mind-Body Dualism / 2. Interactionism ]

Full Idea

The question how mental representations could be both semantic, like propositions, and causal, like rocks, trees, and neural firings, is arguably just the interaction problem all over again.

Clarification

'Semantics' involves meanings. See Idea 4861 for the interaction problem.

Gist of Idea

Semantics v syntax is the interaction problem all over again

Source

Jerry A. Fodor (The Elm and the Expert [1993], §4)

Book Ref

Fodor,Jerry A.: 'The Elm and the Expert' [MIT 1995], p.84


A Reaction

Interesting way of presenting the problem. If you seem to be confronting the interaction problem, you have probably drifted into a bogus dualist way of thinking. Retreat, and reformulate you questions and conceptual apparatus, till the question vanishes.


The 30 ideas from 'The Elm and the Expert'

Is content basically information, fixed externally? [Fodor]
For holists no two thoughts are ever quite the same, which destroys faith in meaning [Fodor]
Broad semantics holds that the basic semantic properties are truth and denotation [Fodor]
It is claimed that reference doesn't fix sense (Jocasta), and sense doesn't fix reference (Twin Earth) [Fodor]
Psychology has to include the idea that mental processes are typically truth-preserving [Fodor]
In the information view, concepts are potentials for making distinctions [Fodor]
Semantic externalism says the concept 'elm' needs no further beliefs or inferences [Fodor]
XYZ (Twin Earth 'water') is an impossibility [Fodor]
Propositional attitudes are propositions presented in a certain way [Fodor]
Truth conditions require a broad concept of content [Fodor]
Inferences are surely part of the causal structure of the world [Fodor]
Participation in an experiment requires agreement about what the outcome will mean [Fodor]
Control of belief is possible if you know truth conditions and what causes beliefs [Fodor]
Theories are links in the causal chain between the environment and our beliefs [Fodor]
An experiment is a deliberate version of what informal thinking does all the time [Fodor]
We can deliberately cause ourselves to have true thoughts - hence the value of experiments [Fodor]
Interrogation and experiment submit us to having beliefs caused [Fodor]
I say psychology is intentional, semantics is informational, and thinking is computation [Fodor]
We are probably the only creatures that can think about our own thoughts [Fodor]
Cartesians consider interaction to be a miracle [Fodor]
Semantics v syntax is the interaction problem all over again [Fodor]
Hume has no theory of the co-ordination of the mind [Fodor]
Rationality has mental properties - autonomy, productivity, experiment [Fodor]
Knowing the cause of a thought is almost knowing its content [Fodor]
If meaning is information, that establishes the causal link between the state of the world and our beliefs [Fodor]
To know the content of a thought is to know what would make it true [Fodor]
A standard naturalist view is realist, externalist, and computationalist, and believes in rationality [Fodor]
Externalist semantics are necessary to connect the contents of beliefs with how the world is [Fodor]
Type physicalism equates mental kinds with physical kinds [Fodor]
Concepts aren't linked to stuff; they are what is caused by stuff [Fodor]