more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 2553

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 1. Mind / a. Mind ]

Full Idea

All that is needed for the mind-body problem to be unintelligible is for us to be nominalist, to refuse firmly to hypostasize individual properties.

Gist of Idea

The mind is a property, or it is baffling

Source

Richard Rorty (Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature [1980], 1.3)

Book Ref

Rorty,Richard: 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature' [Blackwell 1980], p.32


A Reaction

Edelman says the mind is a process rather than a property. It might vanish if the clockspeed was turned right down? Nominalism here sounds like behaviourism or instrumentalism. Would Dennett plead guilty?


The 15 ideas from 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature'

Rorty seems to view truth as simply being able to hold one's view against all comers [Rorty, by O'Grady]
For James truth is "what it is better for us to believe" rather than a correct picture of reality [Rorty]
If knowledge is merely justified belief, justification is social [Rorty]
Pain lacks intentionality; beliefs lack qualia [Rorty]
Is intentionality a special sort of function? [Rorty]
The mind is a property, or it is baffling [Rorty]
Rational certainty may be victory in argument rather than knowledge of facts [Rorty]
Analytical philosophy seems to have little interest in how to tell a good analysis from a bad one [Rorty]
Since Hegel we have tended to see a human as merely animal if it is outside a society [Rorty]
Davidson's theory of meaning focuses not on terms, but on relations between sentences [Rorty]
Can meanings remain the same when beliefs change? [Rorty]
A theory of reference seems needed to pick out objects without ghostly inner states [Rorty]
Nature has no preferred way of being represented [Rorty]
You can't debate about whether to have higher standards for the application of words [Rorty]
Knowing has no definable essence, but is a social right, found in the context of conversations [Rorty]