more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 2583

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 1. Functionalism ]

Full Idea

It is hard to see how to make sense of the analog of color spectrum inversion with respect to non-qualitative states such a beliefs (where they are functionally equivalent but have different beliefs).

Gist of Idea

You might invert colours, but you can't invert beliefs

Source

Ned Block (Troubles with Functionalism [1978], p. 81)

Book Ref

'The Philosophy of Mind', ed/tr. Beakley,B /Ludlow P [MIT 1992], p.81


A Reaction

I would suggest that beliefs can be 'inverted', because there are all sorts of ways to implement a belief, but colour can't be inverted, because that depends on a particular brain state. It makes good sense to me...


The 16 ideas from Ned Block

The Inverted Earth example shows that phenomenal properties are not representational [Block, by Rowlands]
The meaning of a representation is its role in thought, perception or decisions [Block]
Behaviour requires knowledge as well as dispositions [Block]
In functionalism, desires are internal states with causal relations [Block]
Functionalism is behaviourism, but with mental states as intermediaries [Block]
Could a creature without a brain be in the right functional state for pain? [Block]
Simple machine-functionalism says mind just is a Turing machine [Block]
A Turing machine, given a state and input, specifies an output and the next state [Block]
Physicalism is prejudiced in favour of our neurology, when other systems might have minds [Block]
Intuition may say that a complex sentence is ungrammatical, but linguistics can show that it is not [Block]
A brain looks no more likely than anything else to cause qualia [Block]
You might invert colours, but you can't invert beliefs [Block]
Lobotomised patients can cease to care about a pain [Block]
Not just any old functional network will have mental states [Block]
In functionalism, what are the special inputs and outputs of conscious creatures? [Block]
A fast machine could pass all behavioural tests with a vast lookup table [Block, by Rey]