more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 2674

[filed under theme 2. Reason / C. Styles of Reason / 3. Eristic ]

Full Idea

Those who compete and contend in argument aim at five objects: refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism, and the reduction of one's opponent to a state of babbling, that is, making him say the same thing over and over again.

Clarification

A 'solecism' is an error in the use of words

Gist of Idea

Competitive argument aims at refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism or repetition

Source

Aristotle (Sophistical Refutations [c.331 BCE], 165b15)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Sophistical Refutations, On the Cosmos etc (III)', ed/tr. Forster,E.S. /Furley,D.J. [Harvard Loeb 1955], p.17


The 6 ideas with the same theme [argument as a competition rather than for truth]:

People often merely practice eristic instead of dialectic, because they don't analyse the subject-matter [Plato]
Eristic discussion is aggressive, but dialectic aims to help one's companions in discussion [Plato]
Competitive argument aims at refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism or repetition [Aristotle]
If you beat me in argument, does that mean you are right? [Zhuangzi (Chuang Tzu)]
Rational certainty may be victory in argument rather than knowledge of facts [Rorty]
'Eris' is the divinity of conflict, the opposite of Philia, the god of friendship [Deleuze/Guattari]