more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 3002

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / a. Physicalism critique ]

Full Idea

Central state identity theorists had trouble providing for the nomological possibility of rational machines (and hence no space for a non-biological, e.g. computational, theory of intelligence).

Clarification

'Nomological' means concerned with rule-following

Gist of Idea

If mind is just physical, how can it follow the rules required for intelligent thought?

Source

Jerry A. Fodor (Psychosemantics [1987], p. 67)

Book Ref

Fodor,Jerry A.: 'Psychosemantics' [MIT 1993], p.67


A Reaction

I surmise that a more externalist account of the physical mind might do the trick, by explaining intelligence in terms of an evolved relationship between brain and environment.


The 27 ideas from 'Psychosemantics'

Mind is a set of hierarchical 'homunculi', which are made up in turn from subcomponents [Fodor, by Lycan]
Intentionality doesn't go deep enough to appear on the physicists' ultimate list of things [Fodor]
A particle and a coin heads-or-tails pick out to perfectly well-defined predicates and properties [Fodor]
We can't use propositions to explain intentional attitudes, because they would need explaining [Fodor]
Contrary to commonsense, most of what is in the mind seems to be unlearned [Fodor]
Hume's associationism offers no explanation at all of rational thought [Fodor]
We may be able to explain rationality mechanically [Fodor]
Any piece of software can always be hard-wired [Fodor]
In CRTT thought may be represented, content must be [Fodor]
Supervenience gives good support for mental causation [Fodor]
Mental states may have the same content but different extensions [Fodor]
Grice thinks meaning is inherited from the propositional attitudes which sentences express [Fodor]
Obsession with narrow content leads to various sorts of hopeless anti-realism [Fodor]
Meaning holism is a crazy doctrine [Fodor]
If mind is just physical, how can it follow the rules required for intelligent thought? [Fodor]
Behaviourism has no theory of mental causation [Fodor]
Very different mental states can share their contents, so content doesn't seem to be constructed from functional role [Fodor]
The meaning of a sentence derives from its use in expressing an attitude [Fodor]
'Jocasta' needs to be distinguished from 'Oedipus's mother' because they are connected by different properties [Fodor]
Whatever in the mind delivers falsehood is parasitic on what delivers truth [Fodor]
Many different verification procedures can reach 'star', but it only has one semantic value [Fodor]
Evolution suggests that innate knowledge of human psychology would be beneficial [Fodor]
Sticklebacks have an innate idea that red things are rivals [Fodor]
Belief and desire are structured states, which need mentalese [Fodor]
Causal powers must be a crucial feature of mental states [Fodor]
Do identical thoughts have identical causal roles? [Fodor]
Folk psychology is the only explanation of behaviour we have [Fodor]