more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
We may say "From P and If-P-then-Q, infer Q" (modus ponens), but there is no rule of acceptance to say that we should accept Q. Maybe we should stop believing P or If-P-then-Q rather than believe Q.
Gist of Idea
You don't have to accept the conclusion of a valid argument
Source
Gilbert Harman (Thought [1973], 10.1)
Book Ref
Harman,Gilbert: 'Thought' [Princeton 1977], p.157
| 8078 | Modus ponens is one of five inference rules identified by the Stoics [Chrysippus, by Devlin] |
| 20309 | If our ideas are adequate, what follows from them is also adequate [Spinoza] |
| 5395 | Demonstration always relies on the rule that anything implied by a truth is true [Russell] |
| 3094 | You don't have to accept the conclusion of a valid argument [Harman] |
| 13617 | MPP is a converse of Deduction: If Γ |- φ→ψ then Γ,φ|-ψ [Bostock] |
| 13614 | MPP: 'If Γ|=φ and Γ|=φ→ψ then Γ|=ψ' (omit Γs for Detachment) [Bostock] |
| 10257 | Intuitionism only sanctions modus ponens if all three components are proved [Shapiro] |
| 14184 | In modus ponens the 'if-then' premise contributes nothing if the conclusion follows anyway [Read] |
| 15341 | Deduction Theorem: ψ only derivable from φ iff φ→ψ are axioms [Horsten] |